Lawmakers jump into fray, seek answer to constitutional question
The demand for documentation of Barack Obama's eligibility to occupy the Oval Office is surging, with lawmakers in several states now working on legislation that could be used to require future presidential candidates to reveal precisely how they are qualified under the U.S. Constitution's demand for a "natural born citizen."
WND already has reported on a bill co-sponsored by some three dozen lawmakers in Arizona who want to require candidates not only to submit the information, but state officials to independently verify the accuracy.
Bill sponsor Rep. Judy Burges, R-Skull Valley, told WND she already has started getting questions from other states who want details about the proposal.
A separate proposal has been created by a freedom of information action group in New York state, and now the National Conference of State Legislatures, which monitors and tabulates the work of legislative bodies, confirms through its database that several other plans are in the works.
More>>>>
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=122542
What can you do? Call your senators and representative and demand they join the effort to support these efforts.
Wednesday, January 20, 2010
Tuesday, January 19, 2010
3 dozen lawmakers want proof of Obama eligibility
Proposal would demand state officials independently verify information
Lawmakers in Arizona have proposed a law that would require state officials to begin independently verifying the accuracy of newly required documents affirming the constitutional eligibility of any candidate for the U.S. presidency.
"Certainly, there has been controversy over President Obama and his birth certificate, where he was born, etc.," state Sen. Sylvia Allen, R-Snowflake, told the Arizona Capitol Times. "It just makes sense and will stop any controversy in the future to just show you are a natural born citizen."
She is one of about three dozen lawmakers to sign on as co-sponsors.
The plan would accomplish essentially the same thing as that proposed by Rep. Bill Posey, R-Fla., on the federal level.
The provisions of Posey's H.R. 1503 are straightforward:
"To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to require the principal campaign committee of a candidate for election to the office of President to include with the committee's statement of organization a copy of the candidate's birth certificate, together with such other documentation as may be necessary to establish that the candidate meets the qualifications for eligibility to the Office of President under the Constitution."
More >>>>>
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=122432
Lawmakers in Arizona have proposed a law that would require state officials to begin independently verifying the accuracy of newly required documents affirming the constitutional eligibility of any candidate for the U.S. presidency.
"Certainly, there has been controversy over President Obama and his birth certificate, where he was born, etc.," state Sen. Sylvia Allen, R-Snowflake, told the Arizona Capitol Times. "It just makes sense and will stop any controversy in the future to just show you are a natural born citizen."
She is one of about three dozen lawmakers to sign on as co-sponsors.
The plan would accomplish essentially the same thing as that proposed by Rep. Bill Posey, R-Fla., on the federal level.
The provisions of Posey's H.R. 1503 are straightforward:
"To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to require the principal campaign committee of a candidate for election to the office of President to include with the committee's statement of organization a copy of the candidate's birth certificate, together with such other documentation as may be necessary to establish that the candidate meets the qualifications for eligibility to the Office of President under the Constitution."
More >>>>>
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=122432
Monday, January 4, 2010
Annie Hamilton – Wedged Between Barack and a Hard Place!
by Annie Hamilton
Ok, no disrespect intended, but America’s love affair with political correctness is over the top, and let’s faces it, retarded end of discussion. Handled like something out of the Special Olympics Manual for THE SLOW” (if that hurts your feelings, get over it, it’s time our Nation considers a ‘new’ policy on ‘Reality’).
We live in this wussified Nation with weenie Americans who cannot tolerate truth of any kind. Will not allow anyone to talk about Christ in our children’s schools because that is against the neighbor’s right to ‘choose’ THEIR OWN RELIGION. They may be a Jewish person or may practice Wicca or perhaps they are Amish, catholic, Satanist or an atheist.
If they are a Muslim, they are allowed to talk about their ideology, however, and discussing that slideshow is permitted for whatever reason it doesn’t seem to objectify church and state.
Interesting no one seems to be ‘concerned’ about the alien enemies act and the FACT that Islam violates ALL KINDS OF OTHER TREATIES AND ACTS…..and we shouldn’t have any of these people on our soil for ANY reasons whatsoever.
I’m very much with REAGAN for many reasons I’ve covered previously……(oh, gee – there is just something so very OFFENSIVE and extremely UNSAVORY about a group of THUGS who have endeavored to KILL US since the beginning of time?? But really, Need I say much More??
No, I’m NOT over-reacting, this is INDEED what the plan is for all Infidels under Islam (an Infidel is a non-Muslim) and do NOT be fooled. If you are not a ‘ Muslim, “THEY PLAN TO KILL OR ENSLAVE YOU. I plan to allow NEITHER. WHAT ABOUT YOU?
And what is this destructive idiot’s ‘Plan’ regarding additional attacks, threats, etc?
He’s done NOTHING with the exception of continue to use the founding documents for two-ply, encourage our Leaders to gamble our tax dollars away on his pop-tart retard purchases, annoying the hell out of everyone with a pulse…
More>>>
http://sonoranweeklyreview.com/?p=1929
Ok, no disrespect intended, but America’s love affair with political correctness is over the top, and let’s faces it, retarded end of discussion. Handled like something out of the Special Olympics Manual for THE SLOW” (if that hurts your feelings, get over it, it’s time our Nation considers a ‘new’ policy on ‘Reality’).
We live in this wussified Nation with weenie Americans who cannot tolerate truth of any kind. Will not allow anyone to talk about Christ in our children’s schools because that is against the neighbor’s right to ‘choose’ THEIR OWN RELIGION. They may be a Jewish person or may practice Wicca or perhaps they are Amish, catholic, Satanist or an atheist.
If they are a Muslim, they are allowed to talk about their ideology, however, and discussing that slideshow is permitted for whatever reason it doesn’t seem to objectify church and state.
Interesting no one seems to be ‘concerned’ about the alien enemies act and the FACT that Islam violates ALL KINDS OF OTHER TREATIES AND ACTS…..and we shouldn’t have any of these people on our soil for ANY reasons whatsoever.
I’m very much with REAGAN for many reasons I’ve covered previously……(oh, gee – there is just something so very OFFENSIVE and extremely UNSAVORY about a group of THUGS who have endeavored to KILL US since the beginning of time?? But really, Need I say much More??
No, I’m NOT over-reacting, this is INDEED what the plan is for all Infidels under Islam (an Infidel is a non-Muslim) and do NOT be fooled. If you are not a ‘ Muslim, “THEY PLAN TO KILL OR ENSLAVE YOU. I plan to allow NEITHER. WHAT ABOUT YOU?
And what is this destructive idiot’s ‘Plan’ regarding additional attacks, threats, etc?
He’s done NOTHING with the exception of continue to use the founding documents for two-ply, encourage our Leaders to gamble our tax dollars away on his pop-tart retard purchases, annoying the hell out of everyone with a pulse…
More>>>
http://sonoranweeklyreview.com/?p=1929
Thursday, December 31, 2009
U.S. government moving to deport longtime legal residents with criminal convictions
Roger Simmie is no angel.
Twenty years ago, the Mountain View carpenter was convicted of resisting arrest and drug possession. Fifteen years after that, he was found guilty of battering his girlfriend. Three times, he's been convicted of drunken driving.
But it's what he didn't do that got him locked up recently in the Santa Clara County Jail. Simmie, a Scot by birth who fought in Vietnam as a U.S. Marine, never applied for U.S. citizenship.
Now he finds himself facing deportation as one of nearly 400,000 immigrants incarcerated this year by the U.S. government. A growing number of noncitizens who have been living in this country as legal permanent residents are learning that run-ins with the law, even minor ones, are translating into life-altering, one-way tickets to homelands they no longer know.
A report last spring from Human Rights Watch found that 1 out of 5 "criminal aliens" deported from 1997 to 2007 had been in the country legally. Many, like Simmie, have known America as home for decades. "I'm living in limbo," said Simmie, 61, whose friends raised thousands of dollars to hire a lawyer to fight his deportation.
More>>>
http://www.mercurynews.com/ci_14096409?source=most_viewed&nclick_
check=1
Twenty years ago, the Mountain View carpenter was convicted of resisting arrest and drug possession. Fifteen years after that, he was found guilty of battering his girlfriend. Three times, he's been convicted of drunken driving.
But it's what he didn't do that got him locked up recently in the Santa Clara County Jail. Simmie, a Scot by birth who fought in Vietnam as a U.S. Marine, never applied for U.S. citizenship.
Now he finds himself facing deportation as one of nearly 400,000 immigrants incarcerated this year by the U.S. government. A growing number of noncitizens who have been living in this country as legal permanent residents are learning that run-ins with the law, even minor ones, are translating into life-altering, one-way tickets to homelands they no longer know.
A report last spring from Human Rights Watch found that 1 out of 5 "criminal aliens" deported from 1997 to 2007 had been in the country legally. Many, like Simmie, have known America as home for decades. "I'm living in limbo," said Simmie, 61, whose friends raised thousands of dollars to hire a lawyer to fight his deportation.
More>>>
http://www.mercurynews.com/ci_14096409?source=most_viewed&nclick_
check=1
Tuesday, December 29, 2009
Chrysler Dealers and attorneys Donofrio and Pidgeon file lawsuit in NYC
It can now be reported the Bankruptcy case for the Chrysler Dealers who were stripped of their dealerships by the Obama Administration has indeed been filed. Donofrio and Pidgeon have filed a Rule 60 Motion to reconsider on behalf of 21 rejected Chrysler dealers. As was expected, several more dealers have joined in the suit as well. Docket number 6137 was filed today, 12/29/2009 Motion for Relief from Stay to Allow Appeal to Continue filed by Randyl Meigs on behalf of Tommy Manuel Chrysler - Jeep, Inc.. with hearing to be held on 1/21/2010 at 10:00 AM at Courtroom 523 (AJG) Responses due by 1/14/2010. The Debtor in this case is the old Chrysler.
In their briefing, Donofrio and Pidgeon assert that the Judge in the original case, the Honorable Robert J. Gonzalez, United States Bankruptcy Judge for the Federal Court, Southern District of New York, committed an unintentional fraud by miss interpreting an important witness statement. That witness was Fiat executive, Alfredo Altavilla, who stated that restructuring of the Dealer network needed to occur before the Fiat purchase of Chrysler could move forward. The Honorable Judge Gonzalez interpreted Altavilla’s answer to mean that a restructuring did not occur when indeed it did.
More >>>>
http://www.examiner.com/x-7715-Portland-Civil-Rights-Examiner~y2009m12d29-Chrysler-Dealers-and-attorneys-Donofrio-and-Pidgeon-file-lawsuit-in-NYC
In their briefing, Donofrio and Pidgeon assert that the Judge in the original case, the Honorable Robert J. Gonzalez, United States Bankruptcy Judge for the Federal Court, Southern District of New York, committed an unintentional fraud by miss interpreting an important witness statement. That witness was Fiat executive, Alfredo Altavilla, who stated that restructuring of the Dealer network needed to occur before the Fiat purchase of Chrysler could move forward. The Honorable Judge Gonzalez interpreted Altavilla’s answer to mean that a restructuring did not occur when indeed it did.
More >>>>
http://www.examiner.com/x-7715-Portland-Civil-Rights-Examiner~y2009m12d29-Chrysler-Dealers-and-attorneys-Donofrio-and-Pidgeon-file-lawsuit-in-NYC
How Our Borders Were Opened
Part 1 of 2
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dlddGUOyZ7g
Part 2 of 2
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lfK6vIkTEgA
What's your opinion?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dlddGUOyZ7g
Part 2 of 2
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lfK6vIkTEgA
What's your opinion?
The stage is being set for a major ruling from the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals on whether the U.S. judiciary actually can enforce the provisions of the Constitution.
The basic question is being raised in an appeal of a district judge's decision to dismiss a legal challenge to Barack Obama's constitutional eligibility to be president.
WND previously reported U.S. District Judge David Carter's decision to dismiss the complaint that listed several dozen plaintiffs. Gary Kreep of the United States Justice Foundation has filed a notice of appeal to the 9th Circuit in the case. Because of the unusual circumstances in which some of the plaintiffs are represented by another lawyer, attorney Orly Taitz also has filed a motion for reconsideration.
Kreep, who represents plaintiffs Wiley Drake and Markham Robinson, posed the question at the center of the case: "Whether the court may make a determination of whether the president has met the eligibility requirements for office, whether the 'natural born citizen' clause of the
United States Constitution may be enforced by the courts, whether the 'natural born citizen' clause of the U.S. Constitution is a nonpolitical question, whether the court may remove from office a president that was not elected in accordance with the U.S. Constitution."
More >>>
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=116305
The basic question is being raised in an appeal of a district judge's decision to dismiss a legal challenge to Barack Obama's constitutional eligibility to be president.
WND previously reported U.S. District Judge David Carter's decision to dismiss the complaint that listed several dozen plaintiffs. Gary Kreep of the United States Justice Foundation has filed a notice of appeal to the 9th Circuit in the case. Because of the unusual circumstances in which some of the plaintiffs are represented by another lawyer, attorney Orly Taitz also has filed a motion for reconsideration.
Kreep, who represents plaintiffs Wiley Drake and Markham Robinson, posed the question at the center of the case: "Whether the court may make a determination of whether the president has met the eligibility requirements for office, whether the 'natural born citizen' clause of the
United States Constitution may be enforced by the courts, whether the 'natural born citizen' clause of the U.S. Constitution is a nonpolitical question, whether the court may remove from office a president that was not elected in accordance with the U.S. Constitution."
More >>>
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=116305
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
